cause circle brand logo
cause circle brand logo
    MANAGE
    Profile
    User Name
    Role
    PROFILE
    View Profile
    SETTINGS
    Edit Profile
    STAGE ENVIRONMENT
    Stage Environment
    MANAGE
    Logout
    Sign In
    Profile
    User Name
    Role
    PROFILE
    View Profile
    CONTENT
    Content Events
    SETTINGS
    Edit Profile Privacy & Security Notification Settings Connected Accounts
    MANAGE
    SUPPORT
    Guide Help Center
    Donation collected 11 Donations
    US,366,460 Collected
    Logout
    • Home
    • Stories
    • About CauseCircle
    • Blog
    • How It Works
    • Nonprofit Directory
    • Claim Listing
    • Why CauseCircle?
    • For Corporations
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
    • Home
    • Stories
    • About
      • About CauseCircle
      • Blog
    • Nonprofits
      • How It Works
      • Nonprofit Directory
      • Claim Listing
    • Why CauseCircle?
    • For Corporations
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
    Send Feedback

    Help us improve CauseCircle

    We value your feedback! Please let us know if you've encountered any issues, bugs, or if you have suggestions for improving our platform.

    Thank You!

    Thank you for your feedback!

    Your feedback helps us:

    • Fix issues and improve platform stability
    • Develop new features based on user suggestions
    • Make CauseCircle better for everyone
    Follow a Nonprofit First

    To create posts, you need to follow at least one nonprofit. Find nonprofits that align with your values and start following them!

    Follow This Nonprofit First

    To post about this nonprofit, you need to follow them first! Click the follow button on this page to get started.

    cause circle brand logo
    1 Story Information
    2 Share
    Step icon

    Please select an NPO.

    Choose images or videos, or drag & drop them here.

    JPEG, PNG, MP4 and other formats, up to 30 MB each. Maximum 5 media files allowed.

    Please enter a story description.
    Please select a category (optional).
    Step icon

    Share Link

    Spread the word on your favorite platforms.

    Organization
    posted by

    Story Statistics

    2,345 Reads

    80 Shares

    320 Likes

    Related Stories

    1 year ago

    The invisible threads in supply chain mapping

    Uncovering new clues when the trail goes cold!

    Even with all the experience Stand.earth Research Group (SRG) has with supply chain mapping, it’s still surprising how many countries do not supply customs data that clearly state suppliers and buyers in international trade. For example, while India and Vietnam make their customs data available for analysis, China and Germany do not. This means that when tracking supply chains, we occasionally face challenges with unavailable customs data. This results in what look like dead ends. But over years of investigations, we’ve honed some tools to help us uncover connections even when the trail seemingly goes cold.

    SRG’s Trade Statistics Inference

    Customs data is an important tool for supply chain mapping at SRG, because it indicates the sellers and buyers e.g. of deforestation-driver commodities. But we know we can get around these obstacles using a technique we call “Trade Statistics Inference”. By cross-referencing sub-national trade statistical data with company-level industry data, , we can sometimes infer missing information. We can also find patterns and correlations that help fill in the gaps — in some cases even discovering hidden buyer-seller relationships. 

    Our methodology involves compiling various sources of public information. These include commodity trade statistical data, tariff data, shipping and freight statistics, manufacturing capacities, etc. It also entails identifying all known companies and their subsidiaries, and reviewing annual reports, investor information, industry news, finance websites, government news, and government and trade association directories. 

    Case study: Japanese wood pulp traded to China

    Here is an example of SRG’s Trade Statistics Inference. In this case, the methodology was used to determine company-level trade flows between China and Japan even though neither country releases customs data.   

    We first identify the relevant commodity codes. These codes indicate the type of product being traded. In this case, it is dissolving wood pulp.  Next we access sub-national export statistics by jurisdiction from Japanese and Chinese government databases. We then research the producers and operators active in each country. As shown in the diagram above, the exporters (producers) are dissolving pulp mills in Japan, and the receivers (operators) are the viscose factories in China. For each identified mill or factory, we collect data on ownership, parent and subsidiary companies, mill capacity, operational status (operating or idled), and location. 

    By cross-referencing the trade data with the viscose operators in each province, including relative capacities, we accurately estimate the probability of each Chinese receiver’s sourcing from specific Japanese producers. In this example, dissolving pulp only comes from Shimane Prefecture, so we can infer that all the dissolving pulp that China receives from Japan is from this region. Since there are only two producers in Shimane, and one of them produces 90% of the pulp, we can conclude that the majority of the corresponding viscose mill operators in China are sourcing from this producer. In the final step, we match the capacities of each operator to complete the trail and estimate the volumes traded.

    Great outcomes for our clients

    Using our “Trade Statistics Inference” technique, we can overcome data limitations and enhance the comprehensiveness of supply chain analysis – even when customs data is unavailable. By utilizing supplementary data sources and analytical skills, we still derive meaningful insights and trends. Ultimately, this approach can connect the missing dots. We get more insightful research outcomes, and even illuminate supplier-customer relationships that are normally only possible using customs data. 

    – Phoebe Lam, Operations Manager and Researcher, Stand.earth Research Group

    1 year ago

    Complex data reveals clear goals for building electrification

    The report, Roadmap to Fossil Free Homes, showcases the powerful role of analyzing data with a climate-centric lens to shape sustainable urban policies. 

    Harnessing complex data

    At Stand.earth Research Group (SRG) we often leverage a diverse array of data sources in our research. In this example, we illustrate the climate impact of transitioning to all-electric new residential buildings. The data we used includes energy consumption, new building permits, housing surveys, national emissions inventories, polling on climate knowledge, building electrification policies – and many others! By integrating all these sources and analyzing trends, we provide a comprehensive ranking of regions by the potential benefits of building electrification. In this way, we yield rich insights for climate campaigning that highlight the strategic importance of local actions. 

    Our first step was to combine International Energy Conservation Code Climate Zones  with the US Government Census Building Permits Survey We did so at the county level for over 3,000 counties across 50 states. Then, we matched these with the U.S. Energy Information Administration Residential Energy Consumption Survey based on climate zone, division, unit size, and type. This new dataset gave us an estimate of average gas per household type for 2020 by US county. To assess how much gas would be used by an average new build, we used data from the US Government Census American Housing Survey to estimate the percentage of new single and multi units that were using gas by the year of completion. 

    We combined this complex dataset with the county level dataset on building permits surveys to estimate gas usage by volume for projected new builds out to 2030 by unit type, state, and climate zone. Next, we applied a US EPA GHG conversion factor (1 CcF gas = approximately 5.5 kg CO2) to estimate county-level emissions and to estimate the emissions from new builds using gas from 2023-2030. 

    Getting great results

    We discovered through this analysis that nationwide, building electrification policies targeting new buildings could eliminate nearly 140 million metric tons of CO2 by 2030. That’s like keeping over 320 million barrels of oil in the ground!

    Our analysis also highlights the significant impact of local policies. We identified that a relatively small number of policies in specific regions would have an outsized positive impact on emission reductions. Just twelve metropolitan areas account for over 30% of estimated cumulative CO2 emissions. As well, just 14 states contain over 70% of projected emissions from new housing stock between 2023 to 2030. We calculated this by identifying metropolitan areas using population figures for cities and counties as an approximation for emissions for projected new builds.  We used this data to rank top areas where building electrification policies would have the largest impact. 

    Creating effective strategies

    Finally, this county and metropolitan-level data was matched with states that don’t have pre-emption policies in place. This step allowed us to identify top places for the largest positive climate impact. We concluded that more than half (52%) of gas emissions from residential buildings constructed between 2023 and 2030 could be eliminated by passing policies in just 63 metropolitan areas and their surrounding counties. 

    By pulling from a wide range of sources and presenting the findings in a clear and actionable manner, we highlight the significant environmental and health benefits of building electrification. We provide a roadmap for achieving these goals by targeting top regions. Findings like these really highlight how targeted actions can have huge positive impacts for the climate. This research underscores the effectiveness of using accurate and comprehensive data to inform policy decisions. 

    – Dr. Devyani Singh, Investigative Researcher, Stand.earth Research Group

    1 year ago

    Commentary: Peace and Unity in the North

    Maya Menezes, a Senior Climate Finance Organizer with Stand.earth, traveled to Prince Rupert for the third Peace and Unity Summit to build relationships of trust strong enough to stand up and fight for this land and its people - together.

    Setting the Scene

    We are zigzagging through mountains and fields in northern so-called British Columbia. A soft brown-yellow haze reminding us that summer is no longer called summer in the northern interior – but wildfire season. As we approach Terrace, and then Smithers, on our way to Prince Rupert, large gashes appear on the mountainsides where old growth and primary forests once stood tall – now giant cutblocks burning in the heatwave.

    Every now and then the breathtaking mountain and forest scenery is punctured by large pastel blue tubes sitting on top of or beside ancient salmon-rich rivers – the insidious markers of the Coastal Gaslink Pipeline (CGL). Pipeline compressor stations become more and more frequent as we cross into The Yintah – the name the Wet’suwet’en have for their territory. 

    We are heading to join the Peace and Unity Summit, where Indigenous nations across the land, allies from across the Canadian settler state and community members across the region and globally, will gather for the third year in a row to discuss how we build relationships of trust strong enough to stand up and fight for this land and its people – together.

    In February 2020, the entire arteries of the Canadian state ground to a screeching halt as tens of thousands of people in every single major city, port, rail town and urban jungle took to the streets in solidarity with the Wet’suwet’en Nation. In what activists across the globe are still studying as one of the most effective and large-scale mass mobilization in our place-based history; ports, airports, highways, shipyards, railways and urban centers stood still as everyday people sent a message to the federal government: invade Indigenous nations for pipeline expansion and be met with resistance. 

    Two years after the country stood still, three members of the Wet’suwet’en nation gathered in a coffee shop to discuss the urgent need to continue bringing together allied nations across their region of the world; more pipelines are coming and stronger networks must be built. These pipelines are set to carry liquid natural gas (LNG) methane to port through some of the last fresh water reserves on the planet, through old growth and primary forests and without consent through dozens of sovereign nations’ territories’.

    What started as a small under 100 person gathering has grown to a national summit calling land defenders from The Kingdom of Hawaii to Aoterra (so-called New Zealand), from the Salish Sea to Mi’kma’ki. Hundreds gathered in the community center of Prince Rupert to discuss how we build a movement ready to weather what’s coming.

    Why kinship matters

    The Climate Finance Team at Stand.earth is one of the founding members of the national Canadian Banks Network, a broad climate network of dozens of organizations strongly focused on fighting the big banks financing fossil fuel infrastructure. One of our core values has been to center, follow the leadership of, and uplift the Indigenous Nations on the forefront of this struggle. 

    For the past three years Wet’suwet’en and Gitxsan Hereditary Chiefs and leaders have marched with climate campaigners into the halls of power, through the annual general meetings of the Royal Bank of Canada (a key financier of multiple projects being forced through the Yintah without consent) and on the international stage as the battle against fossil fuels is taken to decision-makers doorsteps. 

    Through this relationship of trust and movement building, we have learned so much from the profound northern generosity of our Indigenous partners on the Yintah. 

    We understand that in order to fight oil and gas pipelines, and paramilitary violence exacted on communities and environmental destruction, we need to build relationships, personal trust and kinship that allow us all to take the risks necessary to win.

    Impacts on the Land

    Right now there are roughly “33 compressor stations each using enough power for 30,000 homes,” shared Shannon McPhail, Kispiox Valley resident, longtime ally of the Wet’suwet’en and Gitxsan nations and co-executive Director of Skeena Watershed Conservation. Coastal GasLink refers to human beings as ‘human receptors’ and has determined there’s not enough human receptors on the land to pose a risk. McPhail highlighted that the area CGL says is not populated enough to cause damage is populated by her children and every single person in person in her community.

    “An [explosion] in the Kispiox valley would ignite a forest fire,” McPhail continued identifying the regular flares used at each compressor station. There are many instances on record where compressor stations have exploded in the area and in many locations they are used in. It is clear that, “…it’s not just the pipeline itself, it’s the whole process around it.” 

    United States Military Operatives’ Continued Presence

    In addition to reports of the impacts of infrastructure on the land, a more insidious report back on militarization on the territory was presented. Kai Nagata, a resident of the Kispiox Valley, longtime ally of the Wet’suwet’en and Gitxsan Nations and Director of Communications for Dogwood gave a presentation on the worrying relationships between TC Energy and the United States Military. While it has been widely suspected that fossil fuel companies have been hiring ex-military operatives, homeland security experts, and insurgency specialists who cut their teeth in Iraq and Afghanistan, the last few years have offered damning evidence. 

    Nagata outlined that “…what we need to be asking ourselves is what veterans of the military, former white house staffers under Trump and Bush, former state department heads of security and BC NDP Staffers have to offer TC Energy…” where many are being hired. He continued “…we need to be asking ourselves what training, relationships and mindsets these people bring to TC Energy. They’re hiring former staffers whose job it is to get in the heads of communities and peoples they’re trying to break.” Nagata offered an urgent call to action, naming the ways that their energy giants will pick off our communities one by one like they’re going to war. 

    Where We Go From Here 

    As the finishing touches are put on the Coastal GasLink Pipeline, at least 9 other fossil fuel megaprojects are set for expansion across the region. The TC Energy-owned Prince Rupert Gaslink Transmission (PRGT) is already under construction and mass clearcutting has begun.

    As the Peace and Unity Summit rounded out, hushed whispers went through the crowd as two undercover police officers were identified and asked to leave. This dehumanizing level of constant surveillance in the community centers, homes, children’s schools, private roadways and close door meetings is nothing new to our Indigenous hosts. 

    “Do not be afraid to say that this is your land,” Hereditary Chief Woos of the Wet’suwet’en proclaimed. “I am from this nation and this is my land.” 

    Shannon McPhail asked everyone who has worked on the campaigns that have fought for the land where we were all gathered in the moment to stand- over half the room rose. 

    “This region has a track record of whooping some ass, because of the people in this room. The people in this room have kicked out coal and fought for salmon on the banks of the Skeena. The people in this room are power – and we will do it again.”

    Report Story

    Why are you reporting this Story?

    Your report is anonymous, except if you're reporting an intellectual property infringement. If someone is in immediate danger, call the local emergency services - don't wait.

    Report Story

    Any Additional Notes

    Your report is anonymous, except if you're reporting an intellectual property infringement. If someone is in immediate danger, call the local emergency services - don't wait.

    Report Story

    Thanks for letting us know

    We use these reports to:

    • Understand problems that people are having with different types of content on CauseCircle
    • Show you less of this kind of content in the future
    Share this story
    twitter-logo
    Twitter
    facebook-logo
    Facebook
    linkedin-logo
    LinkedIn
    whatsapp-logo
    WhatsApp
    reddit-logo
    Reddit
    telegram-logo
    Telegram
    pinterest-logo
    Pinterest
    email-logo
    Email
    Page link

    Please Sign In to continue

    Edit Story
    cause circle brand logo

    CauseCircle is a modern content collection hub for nonprofits. Collect all forms of powerful content - photos, videos, testimonials, reviews and field stories from your staff, volunteers, and supporters —  in one secure hub your nonprofit fully owns and controls.

    Turn everyday moments into proof of impact you can use across campaigns, grants, and fundraising to build transparency, trust, and donor confidence.

    Explore
    • About CauseCircle
    • FAQs
    • Nonprofit Directory
    • CauseCircle CMS
    • About the Product
    • Partners
    • Help Center
    Contact
    • Email: hello@causecircle.org
    • Contact Us

    Copyright© 2025, All rights reserved.

    Terms of Service Privacy Policy